- Bankruptcy
- Compensation
- Conveyancing & Real Estate
- Crime
- Employment Advice & Disputes
- Family Law
- Wills, Estates & Wealth Protection
- Building & Construction
- Corporate & Commercial
- Insolvency & Restructuring
- Intellectual Property
- Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Planning, Environment & Local Government
- Property & Water
- Taxation & Duties
- Workplace Relations, Employment and Safety
Claim for death or disability benefit under a superannuation scheme
Many people who are injured forget to check whether they have any death or disability cover as part of their superannuation scheme.
All Australians now have compulsory superannuation cover and many of these policies include a death or disability benefit.It is not uncommon for someone to pursue a claim for compensation or a claim for damages arising out of an accident and then forget to check whether they also have rights to a death or disability benefit under their compulsory superannuation scheme. This is one area where you are allowed to "double dip" because your rights under the superannuation scheme are rights you have paid for with a premium deducted from your superannuation fund.
Any death or disability benefit available under your superannuation scheme will be available under a policy issued by an insurance company. It is easy to prove death but what if you want a disability benefit?
Are you entitled to a disability benefit?
A very typical test under these insurance policies is that you are entitled to a disability benefit for any period during which "you are not capable of earning income, by way of personal exertion from any occupation for which you are reasonably suited by reason of education, training or experience."Sometimes the test will be expressed this way: "You are not capable of earning two thirds or more of your average monthly income, by way of personal exertion." This is a much more reasonable test because it would be a bit unfair to say to a specialist doctor, who was disabled in an accident, that he or she couldn't recover disability benefits because he or she was capable of serving petrol in a service station.
Either way, the test is still quite vague. What is the work for which "you are reasonably suited by reason of education, training or experience?" Obviously opinions can vary.
Insurance companies
Insurance companies typically take a hard line in relation to these claims because once someone is entitled to a disability benefit the insurer is concerned that they may get used to an idle life and show no interest in getting back to work.Once you make a claim for a disability benefit, the insurer will normally refer you to a medical specialist and these tend to be medical specialists who take a rather hardy approach. If the specialist can identify some work which you are capable of doing, this will justify the insurer in refusing the disability benefit and the specialist is likely to find that more cases are referred to him or her by the insurer.
What our clients say
21/11/2011 |
LC, CanberraJoshua Dale -
Testimonials
Hi Joshua
I am still in disbelief [regarding my award of compensation]. Wow!
Thank you so much for your assistance, hard work and unders...
Hi Joshua
I am still in disbelief [regarding my award of compensation]. Wow!
Thank you so much for your assistance, hard work and understanding.
Warmest regards,
LC
I am still in disbelief [regarding my award of compensation]. Wow!
Thank you so much for your assistance, hard work and understanding.
Warmest regards,
LC

Recent Successes
28/11/2011 |
Workers Compensation paybacks in Medical Negligence matters.Jodie Baker -
Recent Success
We have a client who sustained an injury in the course of his employment and was paid compensation pursuant to the Workers Compensation Act ...
We have a client who sustained an injury in the course of his employment and was paid compensation pursuant to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) ("the Act"). The client required surgery to treat the injury and as a consequence of the negligence of the treating doctor, suffered an additional injury.
In the course of the proceedings for damages against the doctor, the client sought a declaration from the workers compensation insurer that payments made to him pursuant to the Act were not repayable pursuant to Section 151Z.
The workers compensation insurer advised us that they considered they had a right of recovery for all weekly compensation benefits and medical expenses paid pursuant to Section 151Z (1) (d) of the Act and would be pursuing recovery of these.
In reply we wrote to the insurer and advised there have been a series of Court of Appeal decisions which have found that in this situation Section 151Z (1) (d) does not operate to allow the workers compensation insurer to recover the payments it has made.
In Hood Constructions Pty Limited v Nicholas [1987] NSWLR 60 the court stated that the injury caused by the medical treatment was not "an injury for which compensation is payable" within the meaning of Section 151Z, notwithstanding the fact that the surgery was undertaken to remedy an injury sustained in the court of employment. The court went on to find that the worker's damages against the doctor were to be reduced to take into account the compensation payments already received.
The workers compensation insurer then conceded that Section 151Z did not apply in this case and they would not be pursuing any recovery from our client. This was important as we were then able to advise our client on his likely damages if he was successful in the claim.
In the course of the proceedings for damages against the doctor, the client sought a declaration from the workers compensation insurer that payments made to him pursuant to the Act were not repayable pursuant to Section 151Z.
The workers compensation insurer advised us that they considered they had a right of recovery for all weekly compensation benefits and medical expenses paid pursuant to Section 151Z (1) (d) of the Act and would be pursuing recovery of these.
In reply we wrote to the insurer and advised there have been a series of Court of Appeal decisions which have found that in this situation Section 151Z (1) (d) does not operate to allow the workers compensation insurer to recover the payments it has made.
In Hood Constructions Pty Limited v Nicholas [1987] NSWLR 60 the court stated that the injury caused by the medical treatment was not "an injury for which compensation is payable" within the meaning of Section 151Z, notwithstanding the fact that the surgery was undertaken to remedy an injury sustained in the court of employment. The court went on to find that the worker's damages against the doctor were to be reduced to take into account the compensation payments already received.
This was confirmed in the matter of Rooty Hill Medical Centre Pty Limited v Gunther [2002] NSWCA 60. The court of appeal confirmed that Section 151Z of the Workers Compensation Act did not apply and the plaintiff’s damages had to be reduced to give effect to the overriding intention of parliament that a worker should not be entitled to both compensation and damages.
The workers compensation insurer then conceded that Section 151Z did not apply in this case and they would not be pursuing any recovery from our client. This was important as we were then able to advise our client on his likely damages if he was successful in the claim.

The fact that the insurer refuses your claim on the basis of their doctor’s report is not the end of the matter. We can refer you to a specialist with a reputation for being more even-handed in these matters, and if that specialist concludes that you are not "fit for work for which you are reasonably suited by reason of education and training or experience", then we can commence legal proceedings so that an independent judge can decide if the insurer was reasonable in refusing your claim for a disability benefit.
Settling on a compromise basis
Once legal proceedings have been commenced, it is not unusual for these claims to be settled on a compromise basis. In fact, if there is a genuine dispute between opposing medical specialists, these claims normally are settled. Sometimes our medical evidence is so strong that we advise you not to compromise at all, in which case the matter may well proceed to a hearing - unless the insurer gives up, as they sometimes do.Why use a lawyer?
There is nothing to stop you making a claim for a disability benefit under your superannuation scheme without assistance from a lawyer. However, if the claim is disputed by the insurer then you will need legal assistance. Insurance companies are very experienced at disputing these claims and their claims officers are backed by lawyers who do nothing else but this type of work. You would be very brave to take them on without legal assistance from someone who specialises in this area.Most of our compensation lawyers have considerable experience in pursuing claims for disability benefits because it is not unusual for accident victims to also have rights under their compulsory superannuation scheme.
Time limits
The time limits which applied to personal injury claims do not apply to the claims for a death or disability benefit under a superannuation scheme. Unless there is some specific time restriction to make a claim within the superannuation policy itself, you can make a claim within six years of your right commencing. As a claim for disability may be a continuing claim, as long as you remain disabled you can claim under the policy and if you cease to be disabled you can claim benefits for the previous six years - subject of course to any particular clause in the policy. Share this page
Make an enquiry
In The Community
30/11/2011 |
Red Cross Blood DriveGabrielle Watts -
In The Community
As part of a Red Cross and YMCA initiative I am going to be donating blood today and voting for Forster YMCA as the gym ...
As part of a Red Cross and YMCA initiative I am going to be donating blood today and voting for Forster YMCA as the gym with the best and most generous members! GO FORSTER!!!
Stacks Blog
18/01/2012 |
INJURED ON AN INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT? While personal injury law is never black and white, knowing who to sue is often fairly clear-cut. For example, if it’s an injury from a motor vehicle accident, you sue the negligent driver’s insurer. If it’s a slip and fall in a store...11/01/2012 |
POST-CHRISTMAS FINANCIAL STRESS Hard to believe it’s that time of year again, yet here we are - 2012. It would be nice to begin the year in a secure financial position. For many Australians though, post-Christmas is a scary time. It’s the time of realisation...
Latest News
4/01/2012 |
YOUNGEST EVER IN LAW SOCIETY ROLE Forster lawyer Gabrielle Watts has been practising law for only three years but her peers have already recognised her excellent work and elected her regional president of the Law Society...22/11/2011 |
MARALINGA SURVIVOR WANTS JUSTICE Port Lincoln's John Easton is among Maralinga veterans seeking compensation for illness caused by the 1950s bomb tests. More than 1000 veterans of nuclear tests in Australia and the Pacific are seeking a compensation payout from the...
Stacks TV
Make an enquiry
| Name: | * |
| Contact Number: | * |
| Email: | * |
| Postcode: | * |
| Area Of Law: |
|
|
Enquiry:
|
|
|
|
|
Stacks Postcode Locator
Enter your postcode to find your nearest specialist.
eg 1234
Nearest Specialists
loading...
loading...
Home | About Us | Locations | People | Expertise | Careers | Community | Latest News | Contact Us | Link Exchange


