- Bankruptcy
- Compensation
- Conveyancing & Real Estate
- Crime
- Employment Advice & Disputes
- Family Law
- Wills, Estates & Wealth Protection
- Building & Construction
- Corporate & Commercial
- Insolvency & Restructuring
- Intellectual Property
- Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Planning, Environment & Local Government
- Property & Water
- Taxation & Duties
- Workplace Relations, Employment and Safety
Other - Over $30,000
Claims for property damage of more than $30,000 tend to be claims for damage to homes or to commercial premises.
Our firm has had a lot of experience in relation to these types of claims. For example, Stacks/The Law Firm acted for the owners of a number of the lodges which were destroyed by the landslide at Thredbo on 30 July 1997, when 2000 m³ of mud and rock collapsed below the Alpine Way.The firm has also acted for large numbers of uninsured homeowners whose homes were destroyed in the Canberra bushfires of 2003. On 18 January 2003 fires which had been burning around the edges of the ACT entered the suburbs of Canberra and more than 500 homes were destroyed or severely damaged. Unfortunately many of those homes were uninsured and we had to pursue, on their behalf, a joint claim for damages.
Once again the law which applies is the ordinary law of negligence.
Coronial inquests
The biggest issue in cases like this is to determine what actually happened. In major disasters like the Thredbo landslide and the Canberra bushfires, there will be a coronial inquest. Lawyers representing affected parties can seek leave to appear at that inquest to ask questions and to have access to all of the material gathered by the police officers assisting the coroner.
Pursuing your rights
Typically the damage which you will suffer will not be part of a major disaster and there will be no coronial inquest.Assume you decided to take advantage of government subsidies for insulation. You engaged a home handyman to install bats in your ceiling. He simply placed them over the top of ceiling lights and the trapped heat resulted in substantial damage to your home.
If you have complete fire insurance then you will probably simply claim on your insurer and leave it to the insurer to pursue any claim against the home handyman.
If you don't have household fire insurance, or if the insurance cover is inadequate, then you will want to pursue your rights against the home handyman.
What our clients say
I am still in disbelief [regarding my award of compensation]. Wow!
Thank you so much for your assistance, hard work and understanding.
Warmest regards,
LC

Recent Successes
In the course of the proceedings for damages against the doctor, the client sought a declaration from the workers compensation insurer that payments made to him pursuant to the Act were not repayable pursuant to Section 151Z.
The workers compensation insurer advised us that they considered they had a right of recovery for all weekly compensation benefits and medical expenses paid pursuant to Section 151Z (1) (d) of the Act and would be pursuing recovery of these.
In reply we wrote to the insurer and advised there have been a series of Court of Appeal decisions which have found that in this situation Section 151Z (1) (d) does not operate to allow the workers compensation insurer to recover the payments it has made.
In Hood Constructions Pty Limited v Nicholas [1987] NSWLR 60 the court stated that the injury caused by the medical treatment was not "an injury for which compensation is payable" within the meaning of Section 151Z, notwithstanding the fact that the surgery was undertaken to remedy an injury sustained in the court of employment. The court went on to find that the worker's damages against the doctor were to be reduced to take into account the compensation payments already received.
This was confirmed in the matter of Rooty Hill Medical Centre Pty Limited v Gunther [2002] NSWCA 60. The court of appeal confirmed that Section 151Z of the Workers Compensation Act did not apply and the plaintiff’s damages had to be reduced to give effect to the overriding intention of parliament that a worker should not be entitled to both compensation and damages.
The workers compensation insurer then conceded that Section 151Z did not apply in this case and they would not be pursuing any recovery from our client. This was important as we were then able to advise our client on his likely damages if he was successful in the claim.

What are the facts?
The most important thing in cases like this is to find out quickly what actually caused the damage. That means taking detailed statements from all relevant witnesses. We have particular expertise in taking those statements, in getting all the crucial information and in understanding what evidence will be admissible in court and what evidence will not be admissible.Once you know the facts, the law is usually quite straightforward. Disasters can occur for reasons outside anyone's control - such as through a bolt of lightning - but usually a careful investigation will reveal that someone was at fault. As long as that person has assets or is insured, then damages can be recovered with a view to restoring you to the position which you work in before the accident.
Are you insured?
There are so many different insurance products available these days that often times the person responsible does have insurance coverage, even if he or she does not realise it at first. For example, household insurance typically covers the owner of a home for fire damage but also covers all family members against any claim for damages if someone is injured on the property.Similarly there can be damage to commercial property. Whether you are the owner or lessee (person who rents property from another) of the business premises where you work, any damage to the property itself is probably going to be covered by insurance. But what if you are out of business for six months whilst the repairs are carried out? What if you are operating a restaurant in those premises and you can't carry on your business six months although you still have to pay your key staff (unless you want to lose them) and other fixed operating expenses?
When would you seek legal assistance?
If the accident looks like it was the result of someone's fault then you want a lawyer quickly involved before the evidence disappears. And not just any lawyer. You want a lawyer with experience in pursuing this sort of claim. Stacks/The Law Firm lawyers have this experience.In The Community
Stacks Blog
Latest News
Stacks TV
Make an enquiry
| Name: | * |
| Contact Number: | * |
| Email: | * |
| Postcode: | * |
| Area Of Law: |
|
|
Enquiry:
|
|
|
|
|
Enter your postcode to find your nearest specialist.
eg 1234
Nearest Specialists
Home | About Us | Locations | People | Expertise | Careers | Community | Latest News | Contact Us | Link Exchange

