Binding death benefit nominations

Some commonly asked questions about binding death benefit nominations

No. In order for a member of a superannuation fund to make a binding death benefit nomination, the rules of that fund must expressly permit it. Some superannuation funds do not allow this. In particular, a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) created prior to 1999 is unlikely to contain a rule permitting the creation of a binding death benefit nomination unless it has been appropriately updated since 1999.

Proper advice must be sought to determine whether a person’s industry fund or SMSF permits the creation of binding death benefit nominations. In the case of an SMSF, advice should also be sought about having the rules of the fund updated so as to permit the making of a binding death benefit nomination.

Consider the following hypothetical example.

Jack lives happily with his second wife, Jill, and their young child. Jack and Jill jointly own their family home, which will pass to Jill by survivorship upon Jack’s death. Jack’s only other significant asset is his death benefit under his self-managed superannuation fund.

Jack also has two teenage children from his first marriage.

Jack wants to leave his superannuation death benefit to the children of his first marriage, as the child of his marriage to Jill will be adequately provided for by assets that are owned by Jill.

By creating a binding death benefit nomination in favour of the children of his first marriage, Jack can ensure that adequate provision is made for these children in the event of his death. Otherwise a share of his death benefits may go to the child in his current marriage, which is not his intention.

It is useful to keep in mind that superannuation policies and the related death benefits attached to them (or separately) can be particularly important estate planning mechanisms for blended families, largely because of the tax laws governing death benefit payments, but also to ensure you provide appropriately for your blended family (generally your spouse and your children from a previous relationship).

Yes. Circumstances can change and your instructions may need to be explicit to reflect this. The wording of a binding death benefit nomination must be specific and give consideration to different eventualities. Regularly reviewing your binding death benefit nomination is advisable, rather than creating it and then forgetting all about it.

Consider the following examples:

  • Leaving your super entitlements to your “spouse” – if you had split up with your former spouse by marriage and were living with a de facto spouse at the time you died, there may be problems determining which spouse receives your death benefits.
  • Leaving a 25% share to each of your four children – in the event that one child predeceases you, what then becomes of the 25% share that would have gone to them?

A Stacks lawyer will be able to help you to consider different eventualities that may affect your estate planning goals.

Superannuation law defines “dependency” and you cannot leave your super entitlements to a non-dependant (note that spouses and children, whether minor or adult, are counted as dependants). Parents, siblings, nieces, nephews and friends are not considered to be dependants. This means that upon your death, the superannuation fund cannot pay the death benefit to such a nominated person, even if it is a binding death benefit nomination.

Even if your superannuation fund accepted the nomination and you thought that the issue was sorted out, if you nominated someone who is a non-dependant, they will not receive your death benefits as you wished.

Therefore, if you want to pay your superannuation fund to a non-dependant, you must pay the fund to your estate and then provide for the gift under your will. This is an oft-neglected process.

Our experts

Postcode

News

What is testamentary capacity? A basic guide
16 Oct
As a lawyer specialising in wills and estates, I find myself increasingly providing advice...
Read More
Home downsizer superannuation contribution offers opportunity to retirees
20 Jun
Important changes are coming to the law on superannuation from 1 July 2018 that could be ...
Read More
Kurt Topper dancing for cancer research
10 Apr
Kurt Topper, Director of Stacks Heard McEwan and our Wollongong-based Accredited ...
Read More
Beware of your life continuing in the cloud after you die
14 Feb
Recently a court had to rule on whether a will written as an unsent 54-word text message ...
Read More
Prenups on shaky ground after High Court decision
13 Feb
Prenuptial agreements appear to be on shaky legal ground after a recent landmark decision ...
Read More
Same sex couples who married overseas should check legal status of wills
30 Jan
Just when same sex couples thought the long fight for marriage equality in Australia was ...
Read More
“I want half” – common myth that assets split equally in family law property settlement
23 Jan
There appears to be a misconception in the community that when a marriage or de facto ...
Read More
Dangers of changing your home ownership structure in your senior years
05 Oct
Parents and grandparents are coming under increasing pressure to use their home to help ...
Read More
Need for caution before signing a retirement village contract
21 Sep
Recent revelations of elderly people being thrown out of home because of fine print in ...
Read More
Elder financial abuse – confronting a hidden epidemic
19 Sep
Elder financial abuse – where a person takes advantage of an elder person’s financial ...
Read More
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
03 May
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law. ...
Read More
Dissolving strata title and the potential for capital gains tax (CGT) liability
20 Apr
Although still uncommon, dissolving strata titles is becoming more prevalent with the rise...
Read More

Why Stacks


No hidden fees
Nobody likes surprises on their bills, so we take the time to agree with you exactly what our work will cost before we do it (not after!)

Deep expertise
Our lawyers aren’t ‘general practitioners’, they’re experts in their chosen fields of practice (many are Accredited Specialists)

Practical advice not legalese
We provide clear, practical advice, in plain English, so that you can make decisions with confidence


Over 25 local offices
Our local offices are owned and operated by friendly, local professionals, who are proud and active members of the communities they serve

Real client care
Genuine care for clients has been at the core of our practice since the first office was opened by ER Stack on the NSW Mid-North Coast in 1931

Progressive practice
We invest in technology and systems so that our services are always cost effective and clients are in control of their own legal affairs

More about our promises

Get help now

It's easy to get help, just tell us your story and we'll help you understand all your options. If you’d like us to help, we’ll agree exactly the work you'd like us to do up front so that you can be certain about our costs.

Your enquiry is completely confidential.

Fill out this form and one of our experts will contact you
within one business day

By submitting this form you agree to the terms of our Privacy policy

Need help? We’re here to assist