Which case won?

28 Jun | Which Case Won

By Tony Mitchell, Tweed Heads

The Facts

Will divides estate equally between two siblings

A case heard in the NSW Supreme Court concerned a battle between two siblings over a self-managed superannuation fund which had been established by their late father.

When the father died, the fund had approximately $1 million in assets. In his will, the father left his estate to be divided equally between his two children, who were an adult daughter and a young son.

The father’s will appointed his adult daughter the sole executor of his estate, as his son was too young to be a co-executor.

Daughter distributes assets of fund to herself, excluding her brother

Before his death, the father also appointed his daughter as the sole trustee of his self-managed superannuation fund. Despite her late father’s wish that his wealth be shared equally between his daughter and his son, the daughter distributed all of the $1 million in the self-managed superannuation fund to herself, to the exclusion of her young brother.

Was the daughter entitled to do this?

casea

The case for the daughter

I was the sole executor of my father’s estate, and as such, controlled the trustee of the self-managed superannuation fund.
The trust deed for my father’s self-managed superannuation fund conferred a discretion on me as trustee to determine how my father’s death benefit was to be distributed.
My father did not leave a binding death benefit nomination directing the trustee to distribute the death benefit equally between myself and my brother.
This meant that I could distribute the whole of the $1 million death benefit to myself and did not have to distribute any to my brother.

caseb

The case for the son

My father’s appointment of my sister as a trustee of the self-managed superannuation fund was invalid because he did not have the capacity to make that appointment.
My father’s will clearly stated that all of his estate was to be divided equally between my sister and myself.
Therefore, the death benefit payable from my father’s self-managed superannuation fund should be divided equally between my sister and myself.

So, which case won?

Cast your judgment below to find out

Case A Case B

Case A won. You were right!

How people voted

a32%

b68%

Expert commentary on the court's decision

Tony MitchellLawyer

“The outcome of this case would have been avoided if the father had left a binding death benefit nomination providing that his death benefit should be divided in the same manner as stated in his will, that is, equally between his two children.”

Daughter legally able to exercise trustee’s discretion in distributing death benefit

The decision in Katz v Grossman [2005] NSWSC 934 is one which may seem to defy notions of justice and common sense. The NSW Supreme Court decided this case in favour of the daughter.

The court determined that despite the father’s will stating that his two children were to share equally in his estate, the daughter who was executrix of her father’s will and who controlled the trustee of her father’s self-managed superannuation fund was indeed legally able to exercise the trustee’s discretion given in the trust deed and distribute the whole of the $1 million death benefit to herself, to the exclusion of her brother.

Appointment of daughter and her husband as trustees held to be valid

The court held that under section 6(4)(b) of the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, the father was entitled to appoint his daughter as a new trustee following the death of his wife, who was a trustee of the fund from September 1983 until she died in July 1998. The court also found that the daughter, in turn, was entitled to appoint her husband as an additional trustee of the fund.

The son had argued that the original deed setting up the fund in 1965 specified that it was for the benefit of employees of the father’s company and because his sister had never been an employee of any of the companies which contributed to the fund, she was not eligible to be a member of the fund.

The daughter’s counterargument – which was upheld by the court – was that the original deed had been amended in 1995 and under the new deed it was no longer a requirement for a fund member to be an employee.

Making a binding death benefit nomination to avoid unintended consequences

The outcome of this case would have been avoided if the father had left a binding death benefit nomination providing that his death benefit should be divided in the same manner as stated in his will, that is, equally between his two children.

Send case to a friend Get in touch with an expert Send me more cases

Have your say

Other cases

Can an unsent text message be a valid will? Which case won?

12 Dec

Can an unsent text message be a valid will? Which case won?

A Queensland man took his own life, leaving behind his wife and several family members.

Could a land owner terminate his option agreement with a developer because of delay by the developer? Which case won?

22 Nov

Could a land owner terminate his option agreement with a developer because of delay by the developer? Which case won?

A land owner owned a large block of land in West Pennant Hills, in Sydney’s north west.

Could a landlord recover rent and lease incentives after the tenant abandoned the premises? Which case won?

08 Nov

Could a landlord recover rent and lease incentives after the tenant abandoned the premises? Which case won?

A law firm was negotiating with a landlord for the lease of office premises in the inner

Can a company legally sack an employee who has been ill for ten months? Which case won?

29 Oct

Can a company legally sack an employee who has been ill for ten months? Which case won?

A man was employed by a company on a full-time basis as a channel manager. He was

What are the limits of a post-employment restraint clause in an employment contract? Which case won?

15 Oct

What are the limits of a post-employment restraint clause in an employment contract? Which case won?

A large clothing retailer with outlets all over Australia employed a chief financial

Who carries the cost when an investor gets scammed? Which case won?

02 Oct

Who carries the cost when an investor gets scammed? Which case won?

In a case study reported in 2016 by the UK Financial Ombudsman, an investor in the United

When does negligent driving become a criminal offence? Which case won?

18 Sep

When does negligent driving become a criminal offence? Which case won?

In the mid-afternoon of 18 April 2016, a driver was driving her car along Nicholson

Should the husband get a much larger share of the marital assets than the wife after their divorce? Which case won?

04 Sep

Should the husband get a much larger share of the marital assets than the wife after their divorce? Which case won?

The husband was aged 39, the wife was aged 37 and they had been married for about ten

Was it an inexperienced doctor, unnecessary surgery or just bad luck? Which case won?

22 Aug

Was it an inexperienced doctor, unnecessary surgery or just bad luck? Which case won?

The patient was a 73-year-old man who was happy, fit and active. In early 2011, he began

Did the old man have the mental capacity to change his will? Which case won?

06 Aug

Did the old man have the mental capacity to change his will? Which case won?

In 2011, a man signed a will which gave his estate to his three children equally. The will

Could the council force a home owner to remove a caravan from her land? Which case won?

25 Jul

Could the council force a home owner to remove a caravan from her land? Which case won?

A Sydney council became aware of home owners in the local area who had converted an old

Who was to blame for a drunken motorcycle collision? Which case won?

09 Jul

Who was to blame for a drunken motorcycle collision? Which case won?

At 5:15 in the morning following a night of heavy drinking, the plaintiff and defendant