Menu
Home › Which case won? › Who is liable for a balcony collapse on a residential property? Which case won?

Which case won?

Who is liable for a balcony collapse on a residential property? Which case won?
05 Nov | Which Case Won

Who is liable for a balcony collapse on a residential property? Which case won?

by Rita Yousef, Elizabeth Street, Sydney

The Facts

Balcony collapses due to deterioration of structural beams

The accident happened on 15 June 2012. Four people were injured when a balcony collapsed at a rented residential property in Collaroy, on Sydney’s northern beaches.

The cause of the collapse was “weathered deterioration of the structural beams and metal fixings”.

The property was managed by a real estate agent on behalf of the landlords. The property was leased to a tenant who had lived at the property for about seven years.

All parties fully aware of balcony’s defects

The real estate agent, landlords and the tenant were all fully aware of the balcony’s defects. The tenant, for example, who was an architect, had made complaints to the real estate agent about the state of the balcony as recently as February 2012, some four months before the accident.

However, she continued to use the balcony and did not prevent access to the balcony.

Those who were injured included the tenant’s daughter and three of her friends. They each made separate claims for compensation arising from their injuries.

The tenant also claimed to have suffered damage and loss as a result of witnessing the distress of her daughter and the friends.

casea
The case for the landlords
  • We wholly delegated our duties to the real estate agent and therefore we are not responsible.
  • The real estate agent did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that inspections, follow ups and repairs were conducted appropriately.
  • The tenant knew about the balcony defects, given that she lived at the property for seven years and wrote to the managing agent about the defects. The injuries would not have occurred if the tenant had prevented access to the balcony.
  • The real estate agent did not ensure that an opinion about the balcony from a properly qualified expert was obtained.
  • Therefore the court should find that it is the real estate agent and the tenant who are responsible for the balcony collapse and the resulting injuries.
caseb
The case for the real estate agent
  • The landlords did not wholly delegate to us full and free authority in relation to repairs and inspections of the leased property.
  • The landlords did not give us sufficient instructions regarding the repairs.
  • The landlords did not respond adequately to the need for repairs and the risks involved.
  • We were not ultimately responsible for arranging the repairs.
  • The tenant knew about the balcony defects, given that she lived at the property for seven years and wrote to us about the defects. The injuries would not have occurred if the tenant had prevented access to the balcony.
  • The landlords did not ensure that an opinion about the balcony from a properly qualified expert was obtained.
  • Therefore the court should find that it is the landlords and the tenant who are responsible for the balcony collapse and the resulting injuries.

So, which case won?

Cast your judgment below to find out
Case A Case B

Case A won. You were right!

How people voted
a41%
b59%

Expert commentary on the court's decision

Rita YousefAssociate
“Managing agents, landlords and tenants must take reasonable precautions to address foreseeable risks of harm at residential properties arising from defects.”
Landlords win as Court of Appeal attributes greatest share of blame to real estate agent

In the case of Libra Collaroy v Bhide [2017] NSWCA 196, the NSW Court of Appeal found that the real estate agent, landlord and tenant were all liable for the damage and loss arising out of the collapse of the balcony, albeit to varying degrees.

The real estate agent was Elders Real Estate, the landlords were Deepak and Alka Bhide and the tenant was Joanne Gillies.

This case was first heard by Judge Curtis of the District Court of NSW. His Honour decided that Elders was 100% liable.

Elders was successful on appeal, in that the Court of Appeal found it was not 100% liable. However, Elders was found to be partially responsible.

Proving negligence in this situation involves ascertaining the cause of the balcony collapse and therefore who was responsible.

The court said: “On the findings of breach I have made, Elders, the Bhides and Ms Gillies are joint tortfeasors liable for the same wrongful act or tort leading to a single damage.”

Liability was apportioned between the real estate agent (50%), landlords (30%) and the tenant (20%).

What was the risk of harm?

It is necessary to look at the relevant risk of harm and whether the real estate agent, landlord and/or tenant ought to have known of it. Without knowing the risk of harm, it is impossible to accurately say what should have been done to address it and by whom, as required by section 5B of the NSW Civil Liability Act 2002.

In this case the court said that “the risk of harm is sufficiently identified as that of people being injured due to the failure to properly investigate, and maintain, the structural integrity of the balcony”.

Precautions that the real estate agent could have taken

Elders as the managing agent owed a duty to the injured people as lawful visitors to the property (and one tenant), to exercise reasonable care in the management of the property.

Elders should have taken precautions such as:

  • Having a proper system in place to manage and monitor maintenance requirements
  • Responding to concerns and quotes regarding the balcony
  • Making recommendations to the landlords and following through adequately in relation to the expert opinion(s) required
Precautions that the landlord could have taken

Despite being permitted to delegate their duties as landlords to Elders, and even though there was a valid agency agreement between them, the Bhides owed a duty as the owners.

The Bhides ought to have concluded that Elders had not been competently performing its duties to manage the property and to follow through with required repairs.

Landlords are required to take such precautions as:

  • Specifically instructing the managing agent to obtain an opinion from a properly qualified expert as to the state of the balcony and any need for repairs
  • Ensuring that all required repairs and replacement work were conducted as soon as practicable
  • Being actively involved in ensuring the appropriate steps are taken and following up until the defects are properly addressed
Tenant should have prevented access to balcony

Despite Ms Gillies’ position as a tenant renting the property, she had a duty of care as the primary occupier.

Ms Gillies had lived at the property for seven years. She was aware of the balcony’s defects and had made complaints about them herself.

The court found that a reasonable person in Ms Gillies’ position would not have allowed her children nor anyone else onto the balcony due to the foreseeable risk of injury.

Practical implications for real estate agents, landlords and tenants

Real estate agents, landlords and tenants must all take reasonable precautions to address foreseeable risks of harm on residential properties arising from defects.

While varying degrees of culpability may be applied to each of these parties, they are required to not only be aware of the state of the properties that they manage, own or occupy; but also to take active steps to address any hazards or defects that could lead to damage and loss.

For further information, please see Who has to pay for repairs? The landlord or the tenant?

NOTICE: This article is accurate as at the time of publication and does not constitute legal advice. Please see our legal notices page for more information. Information related to coronavirus can be outdated very quickly.
Send case to a friend Get in touch with an expert Send me more cases
Have your say

Other cases

Did the employer have vicarious liability for the negligence of one of its bicycle couriers? Which case won?
18 May 2022

Did the employer have vicarious liability for the negligence of one of its bicycle couriers? Which case won?

On 22 December 1994 as he was leaving a building in Sydney, a man stepped onto the
Read More
“Four years after we separated, I received a large inheritance. Now my ex-wife wants a cut.” Which case won?
02 May 2022

“Four years after we separated, I received a large inheritance. Now my ex-wife wants a cut.” Which case won?

A husband and wife were married on 2 February 2002, separated on 9 April 2010 and got
Read More
“The police revoked my gun licence and I want it back.” Which case won?
20 Apr 2022

“The police revoked my gun licence and I want it back.” Which case won?

In 2001, a man was issued with a gun licence on the basis that he had the genuine reasons
Read More
Is an inventor necessarily human? Or could it be an artificial intelligence (AI) system as well? Which case won?
06 Apr 2022

Is an inventor necessarily human? Or could it be an artificial intelligence (AI) system as well? Which case won?

An applicant submitted a patent application for a new food container that is easy for
Read More
Injured cyclist sues council for negligence after falling from poorly maintained bridge – Which case won?
22 Mar 2022

Injured cyclist sues council for negligence after falling from poorly maintained bridge – Which case won?

In April 2008, a cyclist participated in an annual Sydney-to-Queensland charity ride. 
Read More
Was the pub owner entitled to loss of bargain damages after ending the tenant’s lease for failure to pay rent? Which case won?
09 Mar 2022

Was the pub owner entitled to loss of bargain damages after ending the tenant’s lease for failure to pay rent? Which case won?

In January 2007, a tenant leased a 100-year-old hotel west of the Blue Mountains in New
Read More
“I’m a paramedic, not a doctor!” Was a paramedic’s failure to administer adrenaline inconsistent with the exercise of reasonable care? Which case won?
23 Feb 2022

“I’m a paramedic, not a doctor!” Was a paramedic’s failure to administer adrenaline inconsistent with the exercise of reasonable care? Which case won?

On the evening of 21 July 2002, a 25-year-old chronic asthmatic woman drove to her
Read More
“The property vendor made a verbal agreement to accept a 5% deposit. Now they’re suing me for 10%.” Which case won?
08 Feb 2022

“The property vendor made a verbal agreement to accept a 5% deposit. Now they’re suing me for 10%.” Which case won?

The vendor listed a commercial property for sale in South Yarra, Victoria as mortgagee in
Read More
“The rules were changed retrospectively to avoid paying me the sales commission I’d earned.” Which case won?
25 Jan 2022

“The rules were changed retrospectively to avoid paying me the sales commission I’d earned.” Which case won?

Between May 2005 and November 2013, the employee was employed as a sales representative
Read More
“There was insufficient notice of the board meeting, so the new board of directors was elected validly.” Which case won?
15 Dec 2021

“There was insufficient notice of the board meeting, so the new board of directors was elected validly.” Which case won?

Trouble had been brewing for some time at a not-for-profit company.
Read More
“The police wrongly revoked my firearms licence and I want it back.” Which case won?
01 Dec 2021

“The police wrongly revoked my firearms licence and I want it back.” Which case won?

The licensee was the holder of a firearms licence issued under the NSW Firearms
Read More
“The vendor registered the wrong plan of subdivision, and now has to return the deposit we paid.” Which case won?
17 Nov 2021

“The vendor registered the wrong plan of subdivision, and now has to return the deposit we paid.” Which case won?

On 12 November 1973, a vendor and purchaser signed a contract for sale of land near
Read More
Get more cases
Find an office Find a lawyer Chat

Fill out this form and one of our local law professionals will be in contact

By submitting this form you agree to the terms of our Privacy policy